§

Quality Limestone Products, Inc.

153 N.L.R.B. 1009 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Quality Limestone Products, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 359 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  2. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 301 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  3. Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union

    353 U.S. 87 (1957)   Cited 197 times
    Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  5. Plasti-Line, Incorporated v. N.L.R.B

    278 F.2d 482 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 26 times

    No. 13958. May 27, 1960. M.W. Egerton, Sr., Knoxville, Tenn. (M.W. Egerton, Sr., Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel, Egerton, McAfee, Armistead Davis, Knoxville, Tenn., on brief), for petitioners. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and BOYD

  6. Kansas Milling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    185 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 36 times

    No. 4036. November 9, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1950. George Siefkin, Wichita, Kan. (Carl T. Smith, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington D.C., and Leonard S. Kimmell, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the Kansas Milling

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

    340 F.2d 690 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 9 times

    No. 202, Docket 28916. Argued December 7, 1964. Decided January 14, 1965. Stephen B. Goldberg, N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel; Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel; Jules H. Gordon, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Burton A. Zorn, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz Mendelsohn, New York City (Saul G. Kramer, Robert A. Gorman, New York City, Blank, Rudenko, Klaus Rome, Philadelphia, Pa., M. Kalman Gitomer, Herbert H. Brown, Philadelphia