§

Purple Communications, Inc.

365 NLRB No. 50 (N.L.R.B. 2017)
Purple Communications, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Telectronics, Inc. v. U.S.

    490 U.S. 1046 (1989)   Cited 74 times

    No. 88-1397. May 1, 1989, OCTOBER TERM, 1988. C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 857 F. 2d 778.

  4. Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 17 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

  5. Guard Publishing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    571 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 11 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Reviewing an employer's challenge to only the unfavorable portions of an NLRB ruling

  6. Gregory v. Popeyes

    857 F.2d 1474 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 33 times

    No. 87-1461. September 9, 1988. Appeal from the E.D.Mich. AFFIRMED.

  7. Union Carbide Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    714 F.2d 657 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 26 times
    In Union Carbide the sixth circuit wrote: "Where, by policy or practice, the company permits employee access to bulletin boards for any purpose, section 7 of the Act... secures the employees' right to post union materials."

  8. Mid-Mountain Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    269 F.3d 1075 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 1 times

    No. 00-1422. Argued October 9, 2001. Decided November 6, 2001. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Ronald I. Tisch argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Peter A. Susser and Mark M. Lawson. Anna L. Francis, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Lumber and Mill Employers Ass'n

    736 F.2d 507 (9th Cir. 1984)

    No. 83-7117. Argued and Submitted April 10, 1984. Decided June 27, 1984. Howard Perlstein, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A.K. Abraham, Robert M. Cassel, Berman, Cassel Carter, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of An Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge. Honorable James M. Burns, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. SNEED, Circuit Judge:

  10. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  11. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,303 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees the right to engage in or refrain from engaging in union activity