§

Purolator Products, Inc.

160 N.L.R.B. 80 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Purolator Products, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  4. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  5. Labor Board v. Mine Workers

    355 U.S. 453 (1958)   Cited 47 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 64. Argued January 6, 1958. Decided February 3, 1958. The National Labor Relations Board found that an employer had committed an unfair labor practice by assisting a union to defeat the efforts of a rival union to organize the employer's workers, but that the assisted union was not dominated by the employer. It ordered the employer to post certain notices and to withdraw and withhold recognition from the assisted

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 178 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whittier Mills Co.

    111 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1940)   Cited 67 times
    Interpreting Virginian Railway's holding as “[w]here with fair opportunity to all members of the unit to vote, a majority do vote, they are, so to speak, a quorum to settle the matter, and the majority of that quorum binds those not voting, and suffices to select the bargaining representative of the unit”

  8. N.L.R.B. v. J.W. Rex Company

    243 F.2d 356 (3d Cir. 1957)   Cited 20 times

    No. 12019. Argued February 4, 1957. Decided April 10, 1957. William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert H. Kleeb, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board filed pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Northwestern Publishing Company

    343 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1965)   Cited 11 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Northwestern Publishing Company, 343 F.2d 521, 525 (7th Cir. 1965), the court held that "although the information might be secured from the employees themselves, this did not relieve the company from this duty [of supplying the information]."

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

    353 F.2d 76 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 7 times

    No. 20444. November 4, 1965. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Allen M. Hutter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Paul Elkind, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. O.R.T. Bowden, David A. Bartholf, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent. Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, District Judge. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board petitioned this court to adjudge the Respondent in civil contempt because of the alleged