§

Purnell's Pride, Inc.

252 N.L.R.B. 110 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
Purnell's Pride, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Purnell's Pride, Inc.

    609 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 12 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Purnell's Pride, Inc., 609 F.2d 1153, 1156 (5th Cir. 1980), the court dealt with the NLRB's use of the concept of community of interest.

  2. Victoria Station, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    586 F.2d 672 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 7 times

    No. 77-3451. October 2, 1978. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied November 22, 1978. Robert V. Magor of Severson, Werson, Berke Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition For Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before TRASK and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and CRAIG, District Judge. Hon. Walter E. Craig, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. SNEED, Circuit Judge: Victoria Station

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Boston Needham Indus. Clean. Co.

    526 F.2d 74 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 7 times

    No. 75-1074. Argued September 5, 1975. Decided November 13, 1975. Roger T. Brice, Washington, D.C., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne, were on brief, for petitioner. George F. McInerny, Boston, Mass., with whom Lynch, Welch, Whitney McInerny, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE, Circuit Judge, and THOMSEN, Senior District Judge. Of the District of Maryland

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Fidelity Maintenance Constr. Co.

    424 F.2d 707 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 11 times

    No. 27767 Summary Calendar. April 20, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Walter C. Phillips, Director, Region 10, N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. William H. Smith, Jr., Ellison D. Smith, Jr., Columbia, S.C., for respondent. Before THORNBERRY, CARSWELL and CLARK, Circuit Judges. THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: This case is before this Court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued against the Company