§

Pure Storage, Inc.

86895203 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 6, 2019)
Pure Storage, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.

    424 F.3d 1276 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 58 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that attorney argument did not demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact sufficient to avoid summary judgment

  2. In re Sones

    590 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 11 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a picture is not a mandatory requirement for a website-based specimen of use" and disapproving of the "rigid, bright-line rule" the PTO applied

  3. Lands' End, Inc. v. Manback

    797 F. Supp. 511 (E.D. Va. 1992)   Cited 7 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Civ. A. No. 92-0715-A. July 31, 1992 Lawrence Jay Gotts, Kirkland Ellis, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Richard Cullen, U.S. Atty., E.D.Va., Richmond, Va., Richard Parker, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION CLAUDE HILTON, Chief Judge This matter came before the court on July 16, 1992 on cross motions for summary judgment. Both parties agree that no material facts are in dispute and the court should decide this case on the summary judgment motions. The plaintiff, Lands'

  4. Cunningham v. Hous. Auth., City of Opelousas

    764 F.2d 1097 (5th Cir. 1985)   Cited 8 times

    No. 84-4481. July 5, 1985. Raymond L. Simmons, Baton Rouge, La., Aaron Harris, Opelousas, La., for plaintiff-appellant. Felix A. DeJean, III, Thomas J. DeJean, Opelousas, La., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. Before REAVLEY, JOHNSON, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gladys Cunningham appeals from an adverse judgment in her Title VII sex discrimination case against the Housing Authority of the City of Opelousas

  5. Application of Marriott Corporation

    459 F.2d 525 (C.C.P.A. 1972)   Cited 7 times
    Likening the menus at issue to point-of-sale counter and window displays previously found acceptable

  6. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,806 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  7. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 2,954 times   96 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark

  8. Section 2.56 - Specimens

    37 C.F.R. § 2.56   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) An application under section 1(a) of the Act, an amendment to allege use under § 2.76 , a statement of use under § 2.88 , an affidavit or declaration of continued use or excusable nonuse under § 2.160 , or an affidavit or declaration of use or excusable nonuse under § 7.36 must include one specimen per class showing the mark as actually used in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services identified. When requested by the Office as reasonably necessary to proper examination, additional