§

Pulaski Construction Co.

345 N.L.R.B. 931 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Pulaski Construction Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Rashkind v. Marrero

    450 U.S. 913 (1981)   Cited 163 times
    Finding violation of Fourth Amendment rights sufficient

  3. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  4. Hertz Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    105 F.3d 868 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 3 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 95-3621, 96-3000 Argued June 11, 1996. Opinion Filed January 28, 1997. As Amended February 6, 1997. Frank B. Shuster (Argued), Costangy, Brooks Smith, L.L.C., Atlanta, for Petitioner. Peter Winkler, Supervisory Attorney, Vincent J. Falvo, Jr. (Argued), Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, United

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Brazos Elec. Power CO-OP., Inc.

    615 F.2d 1100 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 13 times

    No. 79-2595. April 24, 1980. Rehearing Denied May 29, 1980. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Andrew Tranovich, Barbara G. Gehring, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Brown, Herman, Scott, Dean Miles, Fort Worth, Tex., L. G. Clinton, Jr., T.J. Wray, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WISDOM, FAY and TATE, Circuit Judges. TATE, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

    622 F.2d 425 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that the Board did not abuse its discretion by refusing to defer an information dispute to arbitration

  7. Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    738 F.2d 155 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 83-5407, 83-5509. Argued May 8, 1984. Decided July 3, 1984. John B. Rayson, E.H. Rayson (argued), Kramer, Johnson, Rayson, McVeigh Leake, Knoxville, Tenn., Arthur L. Sutton, Akron, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Gen. Counsel, C.S. Stocking (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before EDWARDS and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. This case is before the