§

Puerto Rico Food Products Corp.

242 N.L.R.B. 899 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Puerto Rico Food Products Corp.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. Smith v. United States

    375 F.2d 243 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 148 times
    Holding that "§ 2680 exempts the government from liability for exercising the discretion inherent in the prosecutorial function of the Attorney General, no matter whether these decisions are made during the investigation or prosecution of offenses"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Guernsey-Muskingum Electric Co-op

    285 F.2d 8 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 58 times
    Finding concerted activity because "a reasonable inference can be drawn that the men involved considered that they had a grievance and decided, among themselves, that they would take it up with management"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Phœnix Mut. Life Ins.

    167 F.2d 983 (7th Cir. 1948)   Cited 68 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Supporting employees' entitlement to write a letter complaining about supervisor

  6. Dobbs Houses, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 531 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 25 times

    No. 19536. December 11, 1963. Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., Robert McD. Smith, Birmingham, Ala., William Fortas, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner, Lange, Simpson, Robinson Somervlle, Birmingham, Ala., Fowler Fortas, Memphis, Tenn., of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Robert Sewell, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES, JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges.

  7. Henning Cheadle, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    522 F.2d 1050 (7th Cir. 1975)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 74-1756, 74-1891. Argued May 22, 1975. Decided September 16, 1975. Richard J. Walsh, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marjorie S. Gofreed, William F. Wachter, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUMMINGS, TONE and BAUER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case arises on the petition of Henning Cheadle, Inc. ("the Company") to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Plastilite Corporation

    375 F.2d 343 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 18 times

    No. 18443. March 30, 1967. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Burton L. Raimi, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief with her. John E. Tate, of Nelson, Harding, Acklie, Leonard Tate, Lincoln, Neb., for respondent. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, GIBSON and HEANEY, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. This case is

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford Radio & Mica Corp.

    258 F.2d 457 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 18 times
    Noting that when motivation of employer in taking certain action is at issue, "[the General Counsel's] refusal to elicit th[e] readily available and crucial testimony of a disinterested witness may well be taken to mean that the information was adverse to his case."

  10. Cleaver-Brooks Mfg. Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 637 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that a strike protesting the replacement of a supervisor where the evidence showed the strike to be based on mere personal antipathy toward a new foreman was unprotected activity.