No. 18345. March 17, 1961. Russell Specter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert T. Thompson, Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Wilson, Branch Barwick, J. Frank Ogletree, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This petition seeks enforcement
Nos. 274, 306, Dockets 29186, 29296. Argued January 6, 1965. Decided March 1, 1965. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City (Michael P. Graff, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board
No. 309, Docket 29236. Argued January 21, 1965. Decided May 3, 1965. Michael R. Brown, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Abraham I. Litwack, Uniondale, N.Y., for respondent. Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. MARSHALL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations
No. 14252. January 29, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 3, 1964. Frederick W. Turner, Jr., Murray B. Woolley, Chicago, Ill., for Melville Confections, Inc. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Harold B. Shore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before SCHNACKENBERG, KNOCH and CASTLE, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case is before the
No. 34581. November 28, 1958. APPEAL AND ERROR — REVIEW — VERDICT. The verdict of a jury must stand unless it can be said, as a matter of law, that there is neither evidence nor reasonable inference therefrom to sustain it. NEGLIGENCE — CONDITION AND USE OF PREMISES — NEGLIGENCE OF STOREKEEPER — EVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH. Where the negligence of the operator of a business is predicated on his failure to keep his premises in a reasonably safe condition for an invitee, it must be shown that he had superior