Search with
Parallel Search
Enter a full sentence between 5 and 30 words to find cases with conceptually similar sentences
or
Keyword Search
Enter keyword terms, accompanied by optional Boolean connectors
ANDfraud AND damagesBoth terms in document
ORcar OR automobileEither term in document
NOTinfringement NOT patentTerm must not appear in document
"""due diligence"Exact match
()appeal AND (verdict OR judgment)Grouping terms
*withdr*wSingle letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrew)
!infring!Root expander (infringe, infringed, infringing)
/ninvestor /5 diligenceTerms within n words of each other
/sfees /s reasonableTerms within same sentence
/padmissible /p warrantTerms within the same paragraph

Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.

CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.

File picker

Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or brief PDF document

Or, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure

Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.

Pucel Enterprises, Inc. v. Grizzly Industrial, Inc.

No. 92032024 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 16, 2008)

ReadRead Attorney AnalysesAnalyses Citing BriefsBriefs Citing CasesCiting Cases Cited AuthoritiesCited Authorities29

Pucel Enterprises, Inc.v.Grizzly Industrial, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal BoardJan 16, 2008

No. 92032024 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 16, 2008)

Loading document...

About us
Jobs
Blog

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Instagram

Help articles
Customer support
Contact sales
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information/Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information
Privacy
Terms
© 2024 Casetext Inc.
Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice.