§

Publicker Industries, Inc.

145 N.L.R.B. 820 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Publicker Industries, Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 514 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  2. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  3. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 192 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taitel

    261 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 16 times

    No. 12335. October 30, 1958. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Sheldon M. Charone, Atty., Chicago, Ill., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Robert J. Wilson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George Rose, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, HASTINGS, Circuit Judge, and WHAM, District Judge. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. This case comes before

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Swinerton

    202 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 22 times

    No. 13303. February 17, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Finding, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elizabeth W. Weston and Abraham Siegel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gardiner Johnson, Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for respondents Swinerton, Jabez Burns Sons, and others. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of an order requiring

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

    179 F.2d 323 (8th Cir. 1950)   Cited 19 times

    No. 14013. January 16, 1950. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Thomas J. McDermott, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. on the brief), for petitioner. Robert H. Tucker, St. Paul, Minn. (Connolly, Tucker Post, St. Paul, Minn., on the brief), for respondent. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN, and RIDDICK, Circuit Judges. SANBORN, Circuit Judge. The National

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Dixie Shirt Co.

    176 F.2d 969 (4th Cir. 1949)   Cited 18 times

    No. 5904. Argued July 5, 1949. Decided September 24, 1949. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Samuel Ross, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. L.W. Perrin, Spartanburg, S.C. (Perrin Perrin and L.W. Perrin, Jr., Spartanburg, S.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Teamsters Allied Wkrs

    313 F.2d 655 (9th Cir. 1963)   Cited 4 times

    No. 17922. January 29, 1963. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles and Janet Kohn, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles K. Hackler, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Before BARNES and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims. MADDEN, Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereinafter called the Labor Board or the Board, has petitioned this Court for