Public Service Company of New Mexico

27 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
  3. Hicks v. Gates Rubber Co.

    833 F.2d 1406 (10th Cir. 1987)   Cited 560 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer liability could arise under the principles of Restatement 219 if: the employer was negligent or reckless; or the employee relied on the supervisor's apparent authority; or the supervisor was aided in his harassment by the existence of the agency relationship
  4. Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.

    400 U.S. 542 (1971)   Cited 259 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it violates Title VII for an employer to have “one hiring policy for women and another for men—each having pre-school-age children.”
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
  7. Jefferies v. Harris Cty. Cmty. Action

    615 F.2d 1025 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 211 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding disclosure of personnel records and agency documents unprotected as opposition in light of employer’s "legitimate and substantial interest" in confidentiality
  8. Craig v. Yale Univ. Sch. of Med.

    838 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D. Conn. 2011)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that the following factual allegations were sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss: trauma; sleeplessness; loss of appetite; substantial loss of employment income; overly burdensome financial hardships; damage to his relationship with his family and friends; and damage to his self-esteem and sense of self-worth
  9. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Unbelievable, Inc.

    71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Unbelievable, Inc., 71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995), we upheld the Board's finding that the employer "engaged in unfair labor practices by eavesdropping on private conversations between employees and [a] Union representative," which occurred in the employee break room.
  11. Section 2000e-3 - Other unlawful employment practices

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3   Cited 14,830 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting retaliation against employees who "oppos[e] any [unlawful] practice"
  12. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,303 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees the right to engage in or refrain from engaging in union activity