§

Public Service Company of New Mexico

28-CA-022655 (N.L.R.B. Feb. 17, 2012)
Public Service Company of New Mexico

9 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,623 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  6. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. George Koch Sons, Inc.

    950 F.2d 1324 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 16 times
    Finding that employer "waived the issue of deadlock by failing to present evidence of deadlock before the ALJ"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Leland Stanford Jr. University

    715 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 7 times
    Enforcing order to provide union with information about employees outside the bargaining unit

  9. Section 1910.132 - General requirements

    29 C.F.R. § 1910.132   Cited 111 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Mandating PPE "wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact"