§

Public Service Co. of Colorado

89 N.L.R.B. 418 (N.L.R.B. 1950)
Public Service Co. of Colorado

9 Cited authorities

  1. Harrison v. Northern Trust Co.

    317 U.S. 476 (1943)   Cited 144 times
    Limiting the amount of the federal estate tax deduction for charitable residuary bequest to amounts actually passing to the charitable beneficiaries after provision for taxes under § 303 of the Revenue Act of 1926

  2. Manley v. Georgia

    279 U.S. 1 (1929)   Cited 130 times
    In Manley v. State of Georgia, 279 U.S. 1, 49 S.Ct. 215, 216, 73 L.Ed. 575, the court had before it a Georgia banking act which declared that "every insolvency of a bank shall be deemed fraudulent, and the president and directors shall be severally punished by imprisonment and labor in the penitentiary * * * provided, that the defendant * * * may repel the presumption of fraud by showing that the affairs of the bank have been fairly and legally administered, * * *."

  3. James v. Marinship Corp.

    25 Cal.2d 721 (Cal. 1944)   Cited 161 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In James v. Marinship Corp., 25 Cal.2d 721, 155 P.2d 329, the California Supreme Court held that a union could not exclude Negroes from membership in the union when at the same time there was a closed shop in the industry.

  4. Colgate Co. v. Labor Board

    338 U.S. 355 (1949)   Cited 36 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 47. Argued November 17, 1949. Decided December 5, 1949. An employer and a labor organization entered into a closed-shop agreement which was valid under the National Labor Relations Act and under state law. The agreement, which the employer had entered into in good faith, was of indefinite duration and had been in effect more than four years. Pursuant to the agreement, upon the demand of the labor organization and in good

  5. Labor Board v. Electric Cleaner Co.

    315 U.S. 685 (1942)   Cited 39 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 588. Argued March 5, 1942. Decided March 30, 1942. 1. The finding of the National Labor Relations Board that, by a supplementary oral contract between an employer and a labor union, it was agreed only that new employees would be required to join the union, was supported by substantial evidence. P. 690. 2. The conclusion of the Board that the closed-shop agreement between the employer and a labor union in this case was not valid

  6. McDonald v. United States

    279 U.S. 12 (1929)   Cited 16 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 117. Argued January 10, 1929. Decided February 18, 1929. 1. Service on a vessel of foreign registry can not be considered residence in the United States for naturalization purposes. P. 19. 2. A proviso is not always limited in its effect to the part of the enactment with which it is immediately associated; it may apply generally to all cases within the meaning of the language used. P. 20. 3. For the proper construction of a proviso

  7. Courant v. Int'l Pho., Motion Picture Indus

    176 F.2d 1000 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that neither the fifth nor fourteenth amendments apply to union activity

  8. Greenwald v. Chiarella

    271 App. Div. 213 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)   Cited 6 times

    June 28, 1946. Appeal from Supreme Court in the first judicial department, WHALEN, J. Louis P. Goldberg of counsel ( Julius C. Levy with him on the brief; Goldberg, Rosh Josephson, attorneys), for appellant. Richard S. Holmes for respondent. COHN, J. This action is brought by plaintiff, a barbers' union, against defendant, the proprietor of a barber shop, to recover the sum of $68, which amount represents an initiation fee of $25 and three months' dues in the sum of $9 for each of two nonunion employees

  9. International Union, Etc. v. Wisconsin E. R. Board

    15 N.W.2d 873 (Wis. 1944)   Cited 3 times

    March 17, 1944. — June 6, 1944. APPEALS from judgments of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: JOHN C. KLECZKA, Circuit Judge. Reversed. For the appellant there were briefs by the Attorney General, James Ward Rector, deputy attorney general, and Beatrice Lampert, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mrs. Lampert. For the respondent there was a brief by Max Raskin, and oral argument by Mr. Raskin and Mr. William F. Quick, both of Milwaukee. A brief amicus curiae was filed by Maurice