§

Public Service Co.

312 N.L.R.B. 459 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Public Service Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Joe B. Foods, Inc.

    953 F.2d 287 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 15 times
    Finding that dispositive recommendations on employee hiring is an indicia of supervisory status

  3. Armco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    832 F.2d 357 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 18 times
    In Armco, the Sixth Circuit held that the § 10(b) period did not commence when the employer communicated its intent to recognize another union, but only when the other union actually signed an agreement with the employer, thereby consummating the labor practices violation.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Walker Const. Co.

    928 F.2d 695 (5th Cir. 1991)   Cited 4 times

    No. 90-4264. April 15, 1991. Howard E. Perlstein, Paul Hitterman, Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Larry W. Wilshire, Richard W. Wiseman, Brown, Herman, Scott, Dean Miles, Ft. Worth, Tex., for respondent. James Walker, Ft. Worth, Tex., for Walker Const. Co. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, RONEY, and DUHE, Circuit Judges. Circuit Judge of the Eleventh Circuit, sitting

  5. Equitable Gas Co. v. N.L.R.B

    637 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1981)   Cited 8 times
    In Equitable, supra, in addition to other factors analyzed, we discussed the importance of the economic motivation for the company's decision.

  6. Caroline Farms Division of Textron v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.2d 205 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 9 times

    No. 12011. Argued May 7, 1968. Decided September 13, 1968. William W. Sturges, Charlotte, N.C., (Weinstein, Waggoner, Sturges Odom, Charlotte, N.C., on brief) for petitioner. Robert E. Williams, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Paul J. Spielberg, Attys., N.L.R.B., on brief) for respondent. Before BRYAN, CRAVEN, and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges. BUTZNER, Circuit Judge: These petitions raise the question