Publi-Inversiones de Puerto Rico, Inc. d/b/a El Vocero de Puerto Rico

13 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors
  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
  4. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 180 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  6. Premium Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    709 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that employees' requests for withdrawal cards, even if such requests indicated that the employees no longer wished to be members of the union, did “not necessarily indicate that [they] no longer wish to be represented by it”
  7. N.L.R.B. v. DeBartelo

    241 F.3d 207 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that substantial continuity "is evaluated principally from the employees' perspective, the crucial question being whether those employees who have been retained will understandably view their job situations as essentially unaltered"
  8. Coastal Derby Refining Co. v. N.L.R.B

    915 F.2d 1448 (10th Cir. 1990)   Cited 6 times
    In Coastal Derby Refining Co. v. NLRB, 915 F.2d 1448 (10th Cir. 1990), we held that when there has been a hiatus between the closing of an enterprise and its reopening, "[t]he relevant inquiry is whether the hiatus was of such length as to call into question the likelihood that former... employees viewed their current jobs as essentially unchanged."
  9. E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co. v. N.L.R.B

    744 F.2d 536 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 82-1767, 82-1903. Argued April 3, 1984. Decided September 26, 1984. Alan G. Burton, argued, E.I. DuPont de Nemours Co., Legal Dept., Wilmington, Del., George E. Yund, Frost Jacobs, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, L. Pay Wynns, argued, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and GIBSON, District Judge. The Honorable Benjamin F. Gibson, United

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Leland Stanford Jr. University

    715 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 7 times
    Enforcing order to provide union with information about employees outside the bargaining unit
  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,316 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
  12. Section 701 - Interim trustee

    11 U.S.C. § 701   Cited 1,878 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Granting the U.S. Trustee the power to appoint a "disinterested person" from "the panel of private trustees" as an interim trustee
  13. Section 1101 - Definitions for this chapter

    11 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 1,818 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Requiring only the “commencement of distribution under the plan”