Protective Investigative Service, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Camco, Incorporated

    340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that knowledge of union activities could be inferred from the fact that an employer discharged eleven of sixteen union adherents without discharging any of its remaining seventy-four employees
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. WKRG-TV, Inc.

    470 F.2d 1302 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 33 times
    Enforcing Gissel Order where employer interrogated employees, promised benefits if the union lost, prohibited solicitation, and otherwise interfered with unionization efforts
  4. Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    375 F.2d 568 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 17 times
    In Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 375 F.2d 568 (4 Cir. 1967), a panel of this Court granted enforcement in part, and denied enforcement in part, of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The order concerned a certain Fred Cox, an employee in the shipping department of the company.
  5. Martin Sprocket Gear Company v. N.L.R.B

    329 F.2d 417 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 17 times

    No. 19463. March 19, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 22, 1964. Winfred Hooper, Jr., George Q. McGown, III, R.W. Decker, McGown, Godfrey, Logan Decker, Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Janet Kohn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BROWN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and