Professional Medical Transport, Inc.

34 Cited authorities

Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio
475 U.S. 574 (1986) Cited 115,936 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks
509 U.S. 502 (1993) Cited 12,422 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination
Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
501 U.S. 190 (1991) Cited 801 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits
First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
452 U.S. 666 (1981) Cited 270 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons
Holly Farms Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
517 U.S. 392 (1996) Cited 136 times
Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute
In re Japanese Electronic Products
723 F.2d 238 (3d Cir. 1983) Cited 598 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that meeting minutes were prima facie authenticated because they had "the appearance, content and substance typical of minutes" and "[t]hey were produced by the defendants"
Zimomra v. Alamo Rent-A-Car
522 U.S. 948 (1997) Cited 104 times
Holding that active supervision unnecessary where challenged ordinance left defendants, car rental companies at Denver International Airport, virtually no discretionary authority in setting and collecting usage fees from their customers because usage fee determined by detailed formula
Billet v. Cigna Corp.
940 F.2d 812 (3d Cir. 1991) Cited 292 times
Holding that employee's "view of his performance is not at issue; what matters is the perception of the decision maker"
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Grizzell v. City of Columbus Div. of Police
461 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2006) Cited 169 times
Holding that testimony regarding a deputy chief's statement regarding the instructions of the police chief was not inadmissible hearsay
Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness
Fed. R. Evid. 803 Cited 13,065 times 85 Legal Analyses
Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities

Professional Medical Transport, Inc.

34 Cited authorities

Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

Holding that a trier of fact may infer discrimination upon rejecting an employer's proffered reason for termination

Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits

Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute

Holding that meeting minutes were prima facie authenticated because they had "the appearance, content and substance typical of minutes" and "[t]hey were produced by the defendants"

Holding that active supervision unnecessary where challenged ordinance left defendants, car rental companies at Denver International Airport, virtually no discretionary authority in setting and collecting usage fees from their customers because usage fee determined by detailed formula

Holding that employee's "view of his performance is not at issue; what matters is the perception of the decision maker"

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Holding that testimony regarding a deputy chief's statement regarding the instructions of the police chief was not inadmissible hearsay

Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities