§

Professional Medical Transport

28-CA-022175 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 8, 2009)
Professional Medical Transport

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 711 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 270 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  3. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. General Electric Company

    418 F.2d 736 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 63 times
    Offering better terms to union locals while bargaining with the unions' national bargaining representative

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Hardesty Co., Inc.

    308 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 2002)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that hardline bargaining positions can be evidence that an employer "had no intention of reaching an agreement"

  7. Eastex, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    556 F.2d 1280 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 1 times

    No. 74-4156. August 5, 1977. Tom M. Davis, Houston, Tex., for Eastex, Inc. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board (Texas case). Before BROWN, Chief Judge, RIVES and GEE, Circuit Judges. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion April 7, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 550 F.2d 198) PER CURIAM: Petitioner-Cross

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second

  9. Rule 901 - Authenticating or Identifying Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 901   Cited 5,343 times   53 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]estimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be" is sufficient authentication

  10. Rule 1001 - Definitions That Apply to This Article

    Fed. R. Evid. 1001   Cited 404 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Defining "writing" as "letters, words, numbers, or their equivalent set down in any form"