Professional Medical Transport
10 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 652 times 11 Legal AnalysesHolding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 269 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
Bourne v. N.L.R.B
332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 93 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Nat. Lbr. Relations Bd.
144 F.3d 830 (D.C. Cir. 1998) Cited 28 timesDeferring to agency's resolution of contradictory evidence
Pioneer Hotel v. National Labor Relations Bd.
182 F.3d 939 (D.C. Cir. 1999) Cited 11 times 1 Legal AnalysesNo. 97-1718 Argued September 10, 1998 Decided July 9, 1999 On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Norman H. Kirshman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Gary G. Branton. David A. Seid, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Acting Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Fred L. Cornnell
Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B
760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985) Cited 26 times 6 Legal AnalysesAffirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176
Automobile Salesmen's Union v. N.L.R.B
711 F.2d 383 (D.C. Cir. 1983) Cited 26 timesSummarizing post-1982 standard for finding violations of the Act in disciplinary actions taken against supervisors
Section 23-1501 - Severability of employment relationships; protection from retaliatory discharges; exclusivity of statutory remedies in employment
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-1501 Cited 304 times 3 Legal AnalysesStating that Arizona statutes that provide exclusive remedies “includ[e] the following. . .”