ยง

Production Workers Union Of Chicago And Vicinity, Local 707; National Production Workers Union

283 N.L.R.B. 340 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Production Workers Union Of Chicago And Vicinity, Local 707; National Production Workers Union

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Allen Bradley Co. v. Union

    325 U.S. 797 (1945)   Cited 304 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendants were not protected by the statutory labor exemption because the union had combined with contractors and manufacturers in order to boycott the plaintiffs' business

  3. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

  4. Local 777, Democratic U. Org. Com v. N.L.R.B

    603 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding "any great amount of deference" "inappropriate" "because of the Board's history of vacillation"

  5. L. 814, Int. Br. of Teamsters, v. N.L.R.B

    546 F.2d 989 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 38 times
    Noting that the Supreme Court "specifically approved the procedure of requesting an administrative body to provide additional explanation for an inadequately articulated decision"(citing Citizens, 401 U.S. at 420)

  6. Production Workers U. of Chicago v. N.L.R.B

    793 F.2d 323 (D.C. Cir. 1986)   Cited 10 times
    In Production Workers, the Board had found that a union's picketing of taxi companies on behalf of independent contractor drivers was a secondary boycott and was therefore prohibited by section 8(b)(4)(B). The Board reasoned that, even though the picketing was not directed toward a neutral employer, it was prohibited because section 8(b)(4)(B) is an "intentionally broad" provision whose protections do not extend to parties who are not statutory employees.