§

Prime Healthcare Services-Garden Grove, LLC d/b/a Garden Grove & Hospital & Medical Center

357 N.L.R.B. 653 (N.L.R.B. 2011)
Prime Healthcare Services-Garden Grove, LLC d/b/a Garden Grove & Hospital & Medical Center

12 Cited authorities

  1. Conley v. Gibson

    355 U.S. 41 (1957)   Cited 59,263 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"

  2. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  3. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  5. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  6. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  7. Local 777, Democratic U. Org. Com v. N.L.R.B

    603 F.2d 862 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding "any great amount of deference" "inappropriate" "because of the Board's history of vacillation"

  8. Gratiot Community Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    51 F.3d 1255 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 93-6533, 94-5023. Argued February 3, 1995. Decided April 21, 1995. Mark D. Nelson (argued and briefed), Catherine R. Giella (briefed), Keck, Mahin Cate, Chicago, IL, for petitioner cross-respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel (briefed), Frederick C. Havard (argued), Marilyn O'Rourke, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for respondent cross-petitioner. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; BROWN and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges

  9. Queen Mary Restaurants Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    560 F.2d 403 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 32 times
    Applying Medo to find that employer violated Act by meeting directly with employees to discuss increases in their seniority

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Master Slack

    618 F.2d 6 (6th Cir. 1980)   Cited 5 times

    No. 77-1641. March 20, 1980. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Jay Shanklin, Mary Schuette, Washington, D.C., Raymond A. Jacobson, Director Region 26, N.L.R.B., Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner. Yelverton Cowherd, W. Kirby Bowling, Bowling Jackson, Memphis, Tenn., for respondents. Before KENNEDY, MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges. ORDER The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) petitions for enforcement of its decision and order, which found violations of Sections 8(a)(1), (3)

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355