Prime Healthcare Services - Encino, LLC dba Encino Hospital Medical Center

17 Cited authorities

  1. Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    501 U.S. 190 (1991)   Cited 801 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits
  2. Bath Marine v. N.L.R.B

    475 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2007)   Cited 20 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a motion for reconsideration was not required to exhaust where the Board had "adequate notice" of the party's position
  3. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    711 F.2d 348 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 41 times

    Nos. 82-1418 to 82-1420, 82-1743, 82-1589 and 82-1940. Argued May 5, 1983. Decided June 30, 1983. George H. Cohen, with whom Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for petitioners, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers, Local Union No. 6-418, AFL-CIO, et al. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Robert K. Carrol, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner, Borden Chemical, A Division of Borden, Inc. Howard A. Crawford, with whom Jack D. Rowe, Kansas City, Mo., was on brief, for petitioner

  4. N.L.R.B. v. General Electric Company

    418 F.2d 736 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 63 times
    Offering better terms to union locals while bargaining with the unions' national bargaining representative
  5. United States Testing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    160 F.3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting employer's contention that it had insufficient notice regarding the potential relevance of a union request for individual insurance claims information because "context is everything," and the employer "put on the table" the concern of growing health care costs
  6. International Chem. Work. Union Coun. v. N.L.R.B.

    447 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 7 times
    Considering "whether the Company's actions as a whole satisfied its statutory obligation to bargain in good faith"
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Associated General Contractors

    633 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 33 times

    No. 79-7484. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1980. Decided October 16, 1980. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1980. Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James P. Watson, Los Angeles, Cal. (on brief), for respondent. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. Of the District of

  8. Nevada Service Emp. Union v. N.L.R.B

    358 F. App'x 783 (9th Cir. 2009)

    Nos. 08-70234, 08-70793, 08-71242. Argued and Submitted October 7, 2009. Filed November 17, 2009. Glenn Rothner, Esquire, Lisa Demidovich, Rothner, Segall Greenstone, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner. Cornele A. Overstreet, Esquire, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board, Phoenix, AZ, Joel C. Schochet, Esquire, NLRB-National Labor Relations Board, Las Vegas, NV, Regional Director, Esquire, National Labor Relations Board, Los Angeles, CA, Raymond Carey, Foley Lardner, LLP, Detroit, MI, for Respondent. Christopher

  9. Lee v. N.L.R.B

    393 F.3d 491 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 2 times

    No. 01-2075. Argued: February 26, 2002. Decided: January 4, 2005. Peitioned for review of order of National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: John Connor Scully, Jr., National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, Virginia, for Petitioners. Richard A. Cohen, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Steven T. Breaux, BellSouth Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, for Intervenor BellSouth. James Bryan Coppess, Washington, D.C., for Intervenor CWA. ON

  10. Cincinnati News. Guild v. Cincinnati Enquirer

    863 F.2d 439 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 15 times
    Observing that allowing a new union to enforce an existing CBA would not "saddle[the employer] with substantive contract provisions that it had neither agreed to nor assumed because the [employer] had in fact agreed to all of the provisions of the contract, including the arbitration provisions"
  11. Section 185 - Suits by and against labor organizations

    29 U.S.C. § 185   Cited 14,734 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal district courts jurisdiction over breach of contract claims arising out of collective bargaining contracts
  12. Section 186 - Restrictions on financial transactions

    29 U.S.C. § 186   Cited 2,364 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting payments to labor union officials
  13. Section 175 - National Labor-Management Panel; creation and composition; appointment, tenure, and compensation; duties

    29 U.S.C. § 175   Cited 4 times

    (a) There is created a National Labor-Management Panel which shall be composed of twelve members appointed by the President, six of whom shall be selected from among persons outstanding in the field of management and six of whom shall be selected from among persons outstanding in the field of labor. Each member shall hold office for a term of three years, except that any member appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term for which his predecessor was appointed shall