§

Premier Fabrics of California, Inc.

224 N.L.R.B. 710 (N.L.R.B. 1976)
Premier Fabrics of California, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  2. Lozano Enterprises v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times
    In Lozano Enterprises v. NLRB, supra, 327 F.2d 814, a complete tentative agreement was reached; this was revised and then signed by the company's president but retained, until after the certification year expired, by its labor consultant, with a misrepresentation on his part to the union that the agreement had not been signed.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Ind. Wire Products Corporation

    455 F.2d 673 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 5 times

    No. 71-1140. February 7, 1972. Ira Goldberg (argued), Elliott Moore, Attys., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcell Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington D.C., Ralph E. Kennedy, Director, Region 21, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Orville L. Marlett (argued), Santa Ana, Cal., for respondent. Before TRASK and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Honorable William M. Byrne, Senior United States District Court Judge

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Huttig Sash and Door Company

    362 F.2d 217 (4th Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times
    In Huttig we found that the granting of six per cent interest by the Board was not an abuse of its discretion, and we now reaffirm this holding.