Preiser Scientific, Inc.

Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 269 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Larry Faul Oldsmobile Co.
316 F.2d 595 (7th Cir. 1963) Cited 11 times
In Faul, a manager's statement that "he might as well as throw the place up for grabs" was made in response to a direct question as to the future of the company by an employee who had already been discharged. Under those circumstances, the court determined that the statement could not in any sense be interpreted as a threat against unionization to current employees.
N.L.R.B. v. Daylight Grocery Company
345 F.2d 239 (5th Cir. 1965) Cited 1 times
No. 22059. May 12, 1965. Rehearing Denied June 10, 1965. Wayne S. Bishop, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B. Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Franklin Reinstine, Reinstine, Reinstine Panken, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and BELL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Board found that respondent had violated § 8(a)(1) of the Act through coercive