Precision Graphics, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.
380 U.S. 263 (1965) Cited 168 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason
Elec. Products Div. of Midland-Ross v. N.L.R.B
617 F.2d 977 (3d Cir. 1980) Cited 27 times
In Electrical Products Division of Midland-Ross Corp. v. NLRB, 617 F.2d 977, 987 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871, 101 S.Ct. 210, 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980), we referred to three elements as usually found in these cases where we enforced a Gissel II order: effect of the unfair labor practices on a significant portion of the bargaining unit, the participation of senior company officials, and the continuing impact of the same factors that undermined the first election.
Chromalloy Min. and Minerals, v. N.L.R.B
620 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1980) Cited 19 times
Enforcing Gissel Order where employer refused to recall a union-supporting employee for his usual seasonal employment, threatened to close the plant, and promised a benefit to one employee if he opposed the union
N.L.R.B. v. Sinclair Company
397 F.2d 157 (1st Cir. 1968) Cited 28 times
In NLRB v. Sinclair Co., 397 F.2d 157, 161 (1st Cir. 1968), one of the three consolidated cases disposed of in the Gissel opinion, the Court of Appeals said, "Whether an employer has used language that is coercive in its effect is a question essentially for the specialized experience of the Board."
N.L.R.B. v. General Stencils, Inc.
472 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1972) Cited 18 times
Denying enforcement after Gissel remand
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Rothkin
434 F.2d 1051 (6th Cir. 1970)
No. 20259. December 17, 1970. On Petition to Enforce an Order of National Labor Relations Board. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, John D. Burgoyne, Russell J. Thomas, Jr., Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John A. Daily, Harry W. Schwab, Johnson, Whitmer Sayre, Akron, Ohio, for respondent. Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges. ORDER. This cause is before the Court on the petition
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Precision Graphics, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

Elec. Products Div. of Midland-Ross v. N.L.R.B

Chromalloy Min. and Minerals, v. N.L.R.B

Enforcing Gissel Order where employer refused to recall a union-supporting employee for his usual seasonal employment, threatened to close the plant, and promised a benefit to one employee if he opposed the union

N.L.R.B. v. Sinclair Company

In NLRB v. Sinclair Co., 397 F.2d 157, 161 (1st Cir. 1968), one of the three consolidated cases disposed of in the Gissel opinion, the Court of Appeals said, "Whether an employer has used language that is coercive in its effect is a question essentially for the specialized experience of the Board."

N.L.R.B. v. General Stencils, Inc.

Denying enforcement after Gissel remand

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Rothkin

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"