Pratt Industries, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968) Cited 102 times 1 Legal Analyses
Applying Taft
Truserv Corp. v. N.L.R.B
254 F.3d 1105 (D.C. Cir. 2001) Cited 19 times
Holding that an employer "was not free to replace unilaterally the contractual grievance procedure"
SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE AUXILIO v. N.L.R.B
414 F.3d 158 (1st Cir. 2005) Cited 12 times
Affirming the Board's conclusion that the sporadic use of per diem employees for employee shortages was not equivalent to a past practice of subcontracting that would have allowed the defendant hospital to act unilaterally in hiring subcontractors
Adair Standish Corp. v. N.L.R.B
912 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1990) Cited 17 times
Holding that the employer violated the Act by instituting changes in the employees' schedules following the union's certification
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wehr Constructors, Inc.
159 F.3d 946 (6th Cir. 1998) Cited 6 times
In Wehr we observed: "As Fibreboard and First National Maintenance make clear, a decision to subcontract is not necessarily subject to mandatory collective bargaining; whether such bargaining is mandatory can only be answered by looking to the particular facts presented in the individual case."

Pratt Industries, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Labor Board v. Katz

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Applying Taft

Truserv Corp. v. N.L.R.B

Holding that an employer "was not free to replace unilaterally the contractual grievance procedure"

SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE AUXILIO v. N.L.R.B

Affirming the Board's conclusion that the sporadic use of per diem employees for employee shortages was not equivalent to a past practice of subcontracting that would have allowed the defendant hospital to act unilaterally in hiring subcontractors

Adair Standish Corp. v. N.L.R.B

Holding that the employer violated the Act by instituting changes in the employees' schedules following the union's certification

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wehr Constructors, Inc.

In Wehr we observed: "As Fibreboard and First National Maintenance make clear, a decision to subcontract is not necessarily subject to mandatory collective bargaining; whether such bargaining is mandatory can only be answered by looking to the particular facts presented in the individual case."