Pottsville Bleaching And Dyeing Co.

6 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 652 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
International Union
459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972) Cited 118 times
Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”
Midwest Stock Exchange, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
635 F.2d 1255 (7th Cir. 1980) Cited 31 times
In Midwest Stock Exch., Inc. v. NLRB, 635 F.2d 1255 (7th Cir. 1980), the court found that an employer discriminatorily enforced its no-solicitation rule by strictly enforcing the rule against union activities but permitting "[s]uch drives as the Crusade of Mercy, collection of blood in a bloodmobile... [on the employer's] premises, the selling of Avon products, Tupperware, boat cruise tickets, raffle tickets, Girl Scout cookies, and a number of other items."
N.L.R.B. v. a T Mfg. Co.
738 F.2d 148 (6th Cir. 1984) Cited 10 times
No. 83-5307. Argued April 5, 1984. Decided June 29, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., William R. Stewart, Allison W. Brown, argued, Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Blake Page, argued, Page, Clay Thomas, Winchester, Ky., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KENNEDY and CONTIE, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge. CONTIE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) applies for enforcement
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,091 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Pottsville Bleaching And Dyeing Co.

6 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

International Union

Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

Midwest Stock Exchange, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

N.L.R.B. v. a T Mfg. Co.

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"