Postal Service

10 Cited authorities

United States v. Abel
469 U.S. 45 (1984) Cited 1,076 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that government’s evidence as to a defense witness’s bias was properly admitted
Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
424 U.S. 507 (1976) Cited 545 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"
Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
502 U.S. 527 (1992) Cited 156 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
437 U.S. 556 (1978) Cited 196 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.
351 U.S. 105 (1956) Cited 294 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
N.L.R.B. v. Calkins
187 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 1999) Cited 53 times 2 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that Nevada law does not extend special protection to free speech interests at the expense of a private store owner's property interest
New York New York, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
313 F.3d 585 (D.C. Cir. 2002) Cited 30 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that when an agency board's decision "purport[ed] to rest on the Board's interpretation of Supreme Court opinions ... the Board's judgment is not entitled to judicial deference"
Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
97 F.3d 583 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Cited 13 times
Finding 8 violation after determining company regularly, and over a period of time, allowed non-union solicitations while prohibiting union solicitations
Southern Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
954 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1992) Cited 3 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Southern Serv., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 954 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1992), the Eleventh Circuit upheld a Board determination that a contractor providing janitorial services at a Coca-Cola manufacturer's site enjoyed the same organizational rights under the Act as the employer's employees did.

Postal Service

10 Cited authorities

Holding that government’s evidence as to a defense witness’s bias was properly admitted

Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

Recognizing that Nevada law does not extend special protection to free speech interests at the expense of a private store owner's property interest

Finding that when an agency board's decision "purport[ed] to rest on the Board's interpretation of Supreme Court opinions ... the Board's judgment is not entitled to judicial deference"

Finding 8 violation after determining company regularly, and over a period of time, allowed non-union solicitations while prohibiting union solicitations

In Southern Serv., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 954 F.2d 700 (11th Cir. 1992), the Eleventh Circuit upheld a Board determination that a contractor providing janitorial services at a Coca-Cola manufacturer's site enjoyed the same organizational rights under the Act as the employer's employees did.