§
Postal Service

8 Cited authorities

  1. Lynch v. Merrell-National Laboratories

    830 F.2d 1190 (1st Cir. 1987)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that the plaintiff's in vivo and in vitro studies were inadmissible; therefore, insufficient evidence existed to avoid summary judgment for the defendant

  2. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

  3. Home Ins. Co. v. Ballenger Corp.

    74 F.R.D. 93 (N.D. Ga. 1977)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that general allegations of relevancy are insufficient to overcome specific objections of an adverse party to the disclosure of reserve information

  4. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  5. Lynch v. Merrell-National Laboratories

    646 F. Supp. 856 (D. Mass. 1986)   Cited 23 times
    Noting that "this Court still could not accept result-based reanalysis of epidemiological studies and criticisms of others' methodology, such as that performed here by Dr. Swan, as reliable data upon which to base an opinion on causation"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Leonard B. Hebert, Jr. Co.

    696 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that the union "has the initial burden of showing relevancy" where it alleges that the employer is using "double breasted operations" to evade contractual obligations with the union, i.e., the employer is allegedly operating two corporations, one hiring strictly union employees, and the other, nonunion employees, to compete for both union and nonunion work

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Leland Stanford Jr. University

    715 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 7 times
    Enforcing order to provide union with information about employees outside the bargaining unit

  8. Shape of Things To Come, Inc. v. County of Kane

    588 F. Supp. 1192 (N.D. Ill. 1984)   Cited 2 times

    No. 83 C 812. June 20, 1984. Michael A. Reiter, Katten, Muchin, Zavis, Pearl Galler, Barry J. Parker, Chicago, Ill., Frank Owen, Hinsdale, Ill., for plaintiff. Anthony G. Scariano, Anthony Scariano, Robert H. Ellch, David W. Regnier, Scariano, Kula Assoc., Chicago Heights, Ill., James T. Doyle, P. Scott Courtin, John K. Lohrstorfer, Steven L. Kadden, City of Aurora Law Dept., Aurora, Ill., John L. Martin, James L. Tuohy, Tuohy Martin, Chicago, Ill., Pamela Kirkland Jensen, Linda Soreff Siegel, David