§

Positive Electrical Enterprises

345 N.L.R.B. 915 (N.L.R.B. 2005)
Positive Electrical Enterprises

7 Cited authorities

  1. American Hospital Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    499 U.S. 606 (1991)   Cited 167 times
    Holding that statements in committee reports were not binding on the agency and do not "ha[ve] the force of law, for the Constitution is quite explicit about the procedure that Congress must follow in legislating"

  2. Lee v. Hunt

    631 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 94 times
    Holding that interpretations and validity of settlement agreements is governed by principles applicable to contracts generally

  3. Iron Workers' Loc. 25 Pen. Fund v. Allied Fence Sys.

    922 F. Supp. 1250 (E.D. Mich. 1996)   Cited 18 times
    Recognizing that fraud in the execution is a viable defense to a section 515 ERISA action, but fraud in the inducement is not.

  4. Hellenic Lines, Ltd. v. Louis Dreyfus Corp.

    372 F.2d 753 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that a party's "promise to arbitrate was sufficient consideration to support [the other party's] promise to arbitrate"

  5. Leach Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    54 F.3d 802 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 4 times

    No. 93-1707. Argued March 24, 1995. Decided May 12, 1995. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. William H. Emer, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Kelly F. Watson, Los Angeles, CA. Robert J. Englehart, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda R. Sher, Acting Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second

  7. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,061 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB