§

Porter-Dewitte Construction Co., Inc.

134 N.L.R.B. 963 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
Porter-Dewitte Construction Co., Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.

    336 U.S. 187 (1949)   Cited 1,010 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that remedial civil contempt does not require proof of criminal intent

  2. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  3. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  5. Carpenters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 651 (1961)   Cited 84 times
    Noting Board's authority is remedial, not punitive

  6. Communications Workers v. N.L.R.B

    362 U.S. 479 (1960)   Cited 70 times
    Striking part of an NLRB order requiring a union to refrain from coercing employees of "any other employer" where the NLRB had found that the union had coerced only the employees of the named employer

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Revere Metal Art Co.

    280 F.2d 96 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 25 times

    No. 242, Docket 25868. Argued March 3, 1960. Decided May 6, 1960. On Petition for Rehearing June 16, 1960. Duane B. Beeson, Washington, D.C., (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Fred Landess, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Jacob E. Hurwitz, New York City, for respondent Union. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations

  8. Morrison-Knudsen Company v. N.L.R.B

    275 F.2d 914 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 24 times
    In Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 275 F.2d 914, the court did not consider the Mountain Pacific doctrine, since the Board had also found that the agreement involved "actually imposed discriminatory conditions of referral.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Local 111

    278 F.2d 823 (1st Cir. 1960)   Cited 11 times
    Enforcing a disgorgement order from the agency

  10. N.L.R.B. v. L. 392, United Ass'n of Journey

    277 F.2d 56 (7th Cir. 1960)

    No. 12799. February 29, 1960. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Richard Scupi, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jonas B. Katz, Cincinnati, Ohio, Brown Gettler, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, for respondent. Before DUFFY and CASTLE, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge. GRUBB, District Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to Section