§

Polycon Industries,Inc.

363 NLRB No. 31 (N.L.R.B. 2015)
Polycon Industries,Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"

  2. Teamsters Union Local 287 v. N.L.R.B

    293 F. App'x 518 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 06-72964, 06-73444. Submitted September 8, 2008. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2). Filed September 18, 2008. Duane B. Beeson, Esquire, Senior, Jason E. Rabinowitz, Beeson Tayer Bodine, PC, Oakland, CA, for Petitioner. Linda Dreeben, Assistant General Counsel, Lester A. Heltzer, Esquire, Robert J. Englehart, Esquire, Gregory Lauro, Esquire, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Alan S. Levins

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Gen. Teamsters Union Local 662

    368 F.3d 741 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 2 times

    No. 03-3699. Argued April 15, 2004. Decided May 13, 2004. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. No. 18-CB-4111. Ronald M. Sharp, National Labor Relations Board, Minneapolis, MN, Aileen Armstrong, Usha Dheenan (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Jill M. Hartley (argued), Scott D. Solden, Previant, Goldberg, Uelmen, Gratz, Miller Brueggeman, Milwaukee, WI, for Respondent. Before FLAUM, Chief

  4. Chicago Tribune Co. v. N.L.R.B

    965 F.2d 244 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 91-2750, 91-2916. Argued April 1, 1992. Decided May 29, 1992. Rehearing Denied June 24, 1992. Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Region 13, Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, Linda J. Dreeben, David Seid (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, John C. Truesdale, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C. and Paul Bosanac, N.L.R.B., Region 30, Milwaukee, Wis., for N.L.R.B. R. Eddie Wayland (argued), E. Andrew Norwood, King Ballow, Nashville, Tenn. and William O. Howe

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second