Polis Wallcovering Co., Economy Decorators Inc. of New Jersey, Ponzio & Sons, Inc., S. W. Kooperman, Inc., Charles Shaid of New Jersey, Claremont Painting and Decorating Co., Inc. and Willard Painting and Sandblasting

5 Cited authorities

Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 471 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 times
Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Lummus Company v. N.L.R.B
339 F.2d 728 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 26 times
In Lummus Co. v. N.L.R.B., 119 U.S.App.D.C. 229, 237-38, 339 F.2d 728, 736-37 (1964), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that "[l]abor relations are practical matters.
Morrison-Knudsen Company v. N.L.R.B
275 F.2d 914 (2d Cir. 1960) Cited 24 times
In Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 275 F.2d 914, the court did not consider the Mountain Pacific doctrine, since the Board had also found that the agreement involved "actually imposed discriminatory conditions of referral.
Nivins v. Sievers Hauling Corp.
424 F. Supp. 82 (D.N.J. 1976) Cited 5 times
Civ. A. No. 74-1049. December 16, 1976. Jamieson, McCardell, Moore, Peskin Spicer by Randolph D. Norris, Trenton, N.J., for defendant-third-party plaintiff. Schneider, Cohen Solomon by Bruce Brafman, Jersey City, N.J., for third-party defendant International Union of Operating Engineers. OPINION CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge. This matter comes before this Court on third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 56. The action was instituted by the plaintiff who was

Polis Wallcovering Co., Economy Decorators Inc. of New Jersey, Ponzio & Sons, Inc., S. W. Kooperman, Inc., Charles Shaid of New Jersey, Claremont Painting and Decorating Co., Inc. and Willard Painting and Sandblasting

5 Cited authorities

Radio Officers v. Labor Board

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

Lummus Company v. N.L.R.B

In Lummus Co. v. N.L.R.B., 119 U.S.App.D.C. 229, 237-38, 339 F.2d 728, 736-37 (1964), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that "[l]abor relations are practical matters.

Morrison-Knudsen Company v. N.L.R.B

In Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 275 F.2d 914, the court did not consider the Mountain Pacific doctrine, since the Board had also found that the agreement involved "actually imposed discriminatory conditions of referral.

Nivins v. Sievers Hauling Corp.