§

Polaris Innovations, Ltd.

IPR2019-01514 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 3, 2020)
Polaris Innovations, Ltd.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Rembrandt Wireless Techs., LP v. Samsung Elecs. Co.

    853 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2017)   Cited 34 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that, for this particular patent, "[t]he clearest statement in the intrinsic record . . . [was] the descriptive statement the applicant made to the examiner when he inserted the limitation into the claims"

  2. Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

    880 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2018)   Cited 10 times   8 Legal Analyses

    2017-1239 01-24-2018 ARTHREX, INC., Appellant v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., ArthroCare Corp., Appellees Anthony P. Cho, Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, P.C., Birmingham, MI, argued for appellant. Also represented by David J. Gaskey, Birmingham, MI. Nathan R. Speed, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Also represented by Richard Giunta, Boston, MA, Michael N. Rader, New York, NY. Dyk, Circuit Judge. Anthony P. Cho, Carlson, Gaskey & Olds, P.C., Birmingham, MI, argued for appellant.

  3. Guinn v. Kopf

    96 F.3d 1419 (Fed. Cir. 1996)   Cited 31 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding disclaimer of an allegedly interfering claim did not divest the Board of jurisdiction over interference proceeding

  4. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 407 times   196 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  5. Section 253 - Disclaimer

    35 U.S.C. § 253   Cited 180 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Granting patentee authority to disclaim issued or pending claims

  6. Section 2 - Powers and duties

    35 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 115 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing the Patent Office to cover the expenses of "persons" other than federal employees attending programs on intellectual-property protection

  7. Section 42.73 - Judgment

    37 C.F.R. § 42.73   Cited 18 times   62 Legal Analyses
    Regarding judgments

  8. Section 42.20 - Generally

    37 C.F.R. § 42.20   Cited 16 times   38 Legal Analyses

    (a)Relief. Relief, other than a petition requesting the institution of a trial, must be requested in the form of a motion. (b)Prior authorization. A motion will not be entered without Board authorization. Authorization may be provided in an order of general applicability or during the proceeding. (c)Burden of proof. The moving party has the burden of proof to establish that it is entitled to the requested relief. (d)Briefing. The Board may order briefing on any issue involved in the trial. 37 C.F

  9. Section 42.72 - Termination of trial

    37 C.F.R. § 42.72   Cited 2 times   16 Legal Analyses

    The Board may terminate a trial without rendering a final written decision, where appropriate, including where the trial is consolidated with another proceeding or pursuant to a joint request under 35 U.S.C. 317(a) or 327(a) . 37 C.F.R. §42.72