§
Pms Corp.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natural Gas Utility District

    402 U.S. 600 (1971)   Cited 187 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding utility district was political subdivision under that standard

  5. Carter v. American Telephone Telegraph Co.

    385 U.S. 1008 (1967)   Cited 63 times

    No. 772. January 9, 1967. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. William VanDercreek for petitioners. Wayne Babler and Leroy Jeffers for American Telephone Telegraph Co. et al., and Spencer C. Relyea III for General Telephone Co. of the Southwest, respondents. Reported below: 365 F. 2d 486.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Lyon Ryan Ford, Inc.

    647 F.2d 745 (7th Cir. 1981)   Cited 38 times
    In Lyon Ryan Ford, after looking through the union authorization cards, the employer and Union discussed details in the Union's proposed contract and the employer added up figures on his adding machine to determine how far apart the parties were on expected wages and benefits.

  7. Photo-Sonics, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    678 F.2d 121 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 13 times
    Upholding decision from a two-member delegee group after third member retired

  8. Pennypower Shop. News, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    726 F.2d 626 (10th Cir. 1984)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that subsequent reinstatement did not alter a finding of discharge where that employer had created ambiguity as to its employees' status

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Checker Cab Company

    367 F.2d 692 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 25 times

    No. 16722. October 4, 1966. Certiorari Denied January 9, 1967. See 87 S.Ct. 715. Allison Brown, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Michael R. Brown, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Louis J. Colombo, Jr., and Philip J. Neudeck, Detroit, Mich., for respondents, William J. Mullaney, Detroit, Mich., on

  10. Ref-Chem Company v. N.L.R.B

    418 F.2d 127 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 17 times
    Finding there was substantial evidence to justify the conclusion that a joint employer relationship existed in a case in which the alleged joint employer contractually had the "right to approve employees, control the number of employees, have an employee removed, inspect and approve work, pass on changes in pay and overtime allowed."