11 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.
306 U.S. 240 (1939) Cited 281 timesIn Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.
Hitchman Coal Coke Co. v. Mitchell
245 U.S. 229 (1917) Cited 463 timesIn Hitchman Coal Coke Co. v. Mitchell, 245 U.S. 229, 262 (1917), this Court struck the portions of a decree enjoining a union from picketing and physical violence because there was no evidence that either of these forms of interference was threatened.
Labor Board v. Electrical Workers
346 U.S. 464 (1953) Cited 125 times 41 Legal AnalysesUpholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute
Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board
316 U.S. 31 (1942) Cited 160 times 2 Legal AnalysesFinding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”
Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.
318 U.S. 9 (1943) Cited 108 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach
228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 67 timesIn National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".
Superior Derrick Corporation v. N.L.R.B
273 F.2d 891 (5th Cir. 1960) Cited 37 timesNos. 17619, 17512. January 21, 1960. C. Paul Barker, Dodd, Hirsch, Barker Meunier, New Orleans, La., Seymour W. Miller, Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel, for Seafarers' International Union of North America, and others. Bernard Marcus, Deutsch, Kerrigan Stiles, New Orleans, La., Eberhard P. Deutsch, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for Superior Derrick Corp. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Norton
Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.
75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948) Cited 51 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.
Republic Steel Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
107 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1939) Cited 59 timesIn Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 107 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1939), modified on other grounds, 311 U.S. 7, 61 S.Ct. 77, 85 L.Ed. 6 (1940), this court stated that Congress must have contemplated that the protection of the National Labor Relations Act would extend to employees who commit minor acts of misconduct while exercising their right to strike.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Organization Masters
253 F.2d 66 (7th Cir. 1958) Cited 5 timesNo. 12103. March 4, 1958. Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Washington, D.C., Robert J. Wilson, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. W. Munro Roberts, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for amicus curiae. William J. Costello, St. Louis, Mo., H. Howard Ostrin, Cooper, Ostrin De Varco, New York City, Herman E. Cooper, Eugene N. Sosnoff, New York City, of counsel, for