3 Cited authorities
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
341 U.S. 694 (1951) Cited 246 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Assoc. Musicians
226 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 39 timesNo. 35, Docket 23550. Argued October 5, 1955. Decided November 3, 1955. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. David I. Ashe, New York City (Ashe Rifkin, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges. CLARK,
N.L.R.B. v. Lawrence Typographical Un. # 570
402 F.2d 452 (10th Cir. 1968) Cited 1 timesNo. 8851. November 4, 1968. Paul J. Spielberg, Washington, D.C., (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Linda R. Sher, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief) for petitioner. George Kaufmann, Washington, D.C., (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Washington, D.C., and Stanley D. Rostov, Kansas City, Mo., with him on the brief) for respondent. Before LEWIS, BREITENSTEIN and HICKEY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is at least