§

Pleasant View Rest Home

194 N.L.R.B. 426 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Pleasant View Rest Home

5 Cited authorities

  1. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  2. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dinion Coil Co.

    201 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 96 times
    Observing that "methods of evaluating the credibility of oral testimony do not lend themselves to formulations in terms of rules"

  4. Time-O-Matic, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 32 times

    No. 12424. March 5, 1959. Edward B. Miller, Merrill Shepard, Willis S. Ryza, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Time-O-Matic, Inc. Pope Ballard, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge and HASTINGS and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner

  5. N.L.R.B. v. American Casting Service, Inc.

    365 F.2d 168 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 11 times

    No. 15339. July 6, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Walter Meyer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Thomas S. Mackinlay, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, District Judge. GRANT, District Judge. This case comes before the Court on petition of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National