Playskool Manufacturing Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Griggs Equipment, Inc.

    307 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 52 times
    In Griggs, the issue was not even mentioned in the Board's Decision, but is noted in the decision of the court of appeals.
  4. Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    93 F.2d 985 (4th Cir. 1938)   Cited 67 times

    No. 4229. January 4, 1938. On Petition for Review of Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Appalachian Electric Power Company to review a cease and desist order entered by the National Labor Relations Board in a proceeding commenced before the Board by a complaint filed in behalf of the International Brotherhood of Electric Workers, Local Union No. 906, charging that the Appalachian Electric Power Company had engaged in and was engaging in unfair labor practices affecting commerce

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. West Point Mfg. Co.

    245 F.2d 783 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. West Point Mfg. Co., 245 F.2d 783 (5th Cir. 1957), and N.L.R.B. v. Williams, 195 F.2d 669 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 834, 73 S.Ct. 42, 97 L.Ed. 649 (1952), it was held that coercive interrogation of employees by Company officials constitutes a violation of the Act.
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters

    230 F.2d 256 (1st Cir. 1956)   Cited 3 times

    No. 5037. Heard December 6, 1955. Decided February 28, 1956. Harold Kowal, Field Atty., Boston, Mass., with whom Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., Attys., were on brief, for petitioner. Sidney W. Wernick, Portland, Me., with whom Berman, Berman Wernick, Portland, Me., were on brief, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN