§

Plant City Steel Corp.

138 N.L.R.B. 839 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Plant City Steel Corp.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Walton Manufacturing Company

    289 F.2d 177 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 32 times

    No. 18345. March 17, 1961. Russell Specter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert T. Thompson, Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Wilson, Branch Barwick, J. Frank Ogletree, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This petition seeks enforcement

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Plant City Welding and Tank Co.

    275 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 18015, 18048. March 22, 1960. Standau E. Weinbrecht, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Granville M. Alley, Jr., Cody Fowler, Paul A. Saad, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before RIVES, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, Circuit Judge, and SIMPSON, District Judge. PER CURIAM. These cases both arise out of an order of the National Labor Relations Board adjudging Plant City Welding and Tank

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Plant City Welding and Tank Co.

    281 F.2d 688 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 2 times

    No. 18015. August 25, 1960. Standau E. Weinbrecht, Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Granville M. Alley, Jr., Cody Fowler, Paul A. Saad, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before RIVES, Chief Judge, TUTTLE, Circuit Judge, and SIMPSON, District Judge. PER CURIAM. In its order of March 22, 1960, 275 F.2d 859, 860, this Court ruled "that Plant City is entitled to have the transcript of the compliance proceedings