Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.
3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 506 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 timesIn Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
Labor Board v. Electric Cleaner Co.
315 U.S. 685 (1942) Cited 39 timesCERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 588. Argued March 5, 1942. Decided March 30, 1942. 1. The finding of the National Labor Relations Board that, by a supplementary oral contract between an employer and a labor union, it was agreed only that new employees would be required to join the union, was supported by substantial evidence. P. 690. 2. The conclusion of the Board that the closed-shop agreement between the employer and a labor union in this case was not valid