Pitsco, Inc.
2 Cited authorities
Application of Abcor Development Corp.
588 F.2d 811 (C.C.P.A. 1978) Cited 36 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Abcor, the question before the court was whether applicant's alleged mark (GASBADGE) was "merely descriptive" within the meaning of § 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(1).
Application of Thunderbird Products Corp.
406 F.2d 1389 (C.C.P.A. 1969) Cited 8 timesPatent Appeal Nos. 8084, 8085. March 6, 1969. Eugene F. Buell, Buell, Blenko Ziesenheim, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant. Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D.C. (Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., of counsel) for the Commissioner of Patents. [Oral argument January 9, 1969 by Mr. Buell and Mr. Nakamura] Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN and KIRKPATRICK, Judges. Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. RICH, Judge. These two appeals from decisions