Pipe Fitters Local 539
3 Cited authorities
National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
386 U.S. 612 (1967) Cited 392 timesHolding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under ยง 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"
Houston Insulation Contractors Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
386 U.S. 664 (1967) Cited 29 timesIn Houston Insulation Contractors' Ass'n v. NLRB, 386 U.S. 664, 87 S.Ct. 1278, 18 L.Ed.2d 389 (1967), the Court, relying largely on the reasoning in National Woodwork, held that a work preservation agreement between a company and a local union could be effectuated by another local of the same union.
American Boiler Manufacturers v. N.L.R.B
366 F.2d 823 (8th Cir. 1966) Cited 1 timesNo. 18107. October 6, 1966. Kenneth C. McGuiness, of Vedder, Price, Kaufman Kammholz McGuiness, Washington, D.C., for American Boiler Mfgrs. Assn. Stanley R. Strauss, Washington, D.C., and Moller, Talent Kuelthau, St. Louis, Mo., were with him on the brief. Donald J. Capuano, of O'Donoghue O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., for United Assn. Pipefitters Local Union 455. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., was with him on the briefs. Louis Sherman and Charles R. Donnenfeld, of Sherman Dunn, Washington