Pioneer Fishing Corp.

11 Cited authorities

Letter Carriers v. Austin
418 U.S. 264 (1974) Cited 609 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union newsletter's description of a “scab” as a “traitor” could not be construed as a factual assertion
Greenbelt Pub. Assn. v. Bresler
398 U.S. 6 (1970) Cited 663 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that use of the word "blackmail" to describe plaintiff's negotiating position could not be understood as a statement of fact
Linn v. Plant Guard Workers
383 U.S. 53 (1966) Cited 732 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 495 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Dreis Krump Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
544 F.2d 320 (7th Cir. 1976) Cited 48 times 1 Legal Analyses
Upholding Board's refusal to defer on ground that award would violate employee's § 7 rights.
Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 56 times
Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. N.L.R.B
407 F.2d 1357 (4th Cir. 1969) Cited 38 times
Noting that, while timing is a factor, "the thrust of Exchange Parts is the condemnation of granting such benefits with the purpose of affecting the outcome of an election"
N.L.R.B. v. Joseph Antell, Inc.
358 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1966) Cited 26 times
In Antell, the court stated that the smallness of a plant, or a staff, may be material as bearing on the knowledge on the part of the employer of an employee's union activities, but only to the extent that it may be shown to have made it likely that the employer observed, or otherwise learned about the activity in question.
Raytheon Company v. N.L.R.B
326 F.2d 471 (1st Cir. 1964) Cited 27 times
No. 6126. Heard November 4, 1963. Decided January 7, 1964. Robert L. Molinar, Lexington, Mass., for petitioner. James C. Paras, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marion L. Griffin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. ALDRICH, Circuit Judge. This case involving a finding
Walls Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B
321 F.2d 753 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Cited 23 times
Holding that complaint to state health department was protected conduct given lack of evidence that "the allegations were made with intent to falsify or maliciously injure the [employer]"

Pioneer Fishing Corp.

11 Cited authorities

Holding that a union newsletter's description of a “scab” as a “traitor” could not be construed as a factual assertion

Holding that use of the word "blackmail" to describe plaintiff's negotiating position could not be understood as a statement of fact

Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Upholding Board's refusal to defer on ground that award would violate employee's § 7 rights.

Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

Noting that, while timing is a factor, "the thrust of Exchange Parts is the condemnation of granting such benefits with the purpose of affecting the outcome of an election"

Holding that complaint to state health department was protected conduct given lack of evidence that "the allegations were made with intent to falsify or maliciously injure the [employer]"