16 Cited authorities
Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
501 U.S. 190 (1991) Cited 802 times 8 Legal AnalysesHolding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 234 timesIn Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968) Cited 103 times 1 Legal AnalysesApplying Taft
Marlene Industries Corp. v. N.L.R.B
712 F.2d 1011 (6th Cir. 1983) Cited 36 timesIn Marlene Industries Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 712 F.2d 1011 (6th Cir. 1983), this Court stated: "[w]e are mindful of the admonishment that 'neither collateral estoppel nor res judicata is rigidly applied.
Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
632 F.2d 721 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 38 timesRuling that "[h]ealth care plans are mandatory subjects of bargaining" under the NLRA, and holding that a company's unilateral, material changes to health care benefits violates the Act
General Indus. Emp. Un. Local 42 v. N.L.R.B
951 F.2d 1308 (D.C. Cir. 1991) Cited 14 timesNo. 91-1036. Argued October 25, 1991. Decided December 27, 1991. Donald B. Greenspon, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. William A. Baudler, Atty. N.L.R.B., with whom Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent. Beverly Oyama, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for respondent. John S. Schauer, with whom Camille A. Olson, Chicago, Ill., was on the brief, for intervenor. Petition for
N.L.R.B. v. Transport Service Co.
973 F.2d 562 (7th Cir. 1992) Cited 6 timesNo. 91-2049. Argued January 17, 1992. Decided August 26, 1992. Robert J. Englehart (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Region 13, Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, Collis Suzanne Stocking, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leonard R. Kofkin (argued), Fagel Haber, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before FLAUM, and MANION, Circuit Judges, and CURRAN, District Judge. Hon. Thomas J. Curran, District
Newport News Shipbuilding v. N.L.R.B
602 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1979) Cited 13 timesHolding that employer's proposal to change bargaining unit definition from "designers" to "draftsmen" would not merely affect work assignments but would alter the scope of the bargaining unit, because it would "not only modify the job functions of the various unit members but also affect their right to representation"
Drug Package, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
570 F.2d 1340 (8th Cir. 1978) Cited 14 timesNo. 77-1149. Submitted November 14, 1977. Decided February 13, 1978. D. J. Sullivan of Lewis, Rice, Tucker, Allen Chubb, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner; Michael J. Tannler and Timothy L. Stalnaker, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief. Joseph A. Oertel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; William R. Stewart, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,339 times 88 Legal AnalysesGranting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.
29 U.S.C. § 157 Cited 3,318 times 98 Legal AnalysesGranting "employees" the right to unionize