§

Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC

368 NLRB No. 97 (N.L.R.B. 2019)
Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC

16 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23

    484 U.S. 112 (1987)   Cited 347 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal court has no authority to review a decision of the NLRB's General Counsel dismissing an unfair labor practice complaint pursuant to an informal settlement in which the charging party refused to join

  3. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  4. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  5. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"

  6. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  7. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

  8. Veritas Health Servs., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    895 F.3d 69 (D.C. Cir. 2018)   Cited 7 times

    No. 16-1058 C/w 16-1076, 16-1110 07-10-2018 VERITAS HEALTH SERVICES, INC., d/b/a Chino Valley Medical Center, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals, NUHHCE, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Intervenor Jamie Konn, argued the cause for petitioner Veritas Health Services, Inc. With him on the briefs was Jonathan Batten, Washington, DC. Glenn M. Taubman argued the cause for petitioner Jose Lopez, Jr. With him on the briefs

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Local 348-S

    273 F. App'x 40 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 2 times
    Documenting that the union bargained for a neutrality agreement from employer, which included the right to enter employer's premises

  10. United Supermarkets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    862 F.2d 549 (5th Cir. 1989)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 88-4027. January 3, 1989. Don Graf, Dan G. Young, McCleskey, Harriger, Brazill Graf, Lubbock, Tex., for petitioner cross-respondent. Wm. M. Bernstein, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Aileen A. Armstrong, Barbara A. Atkin, Washington, D.C., Michael Dunn, Regional Director, NLRB, Edward B. Valverde, Fort Worth, Tex., for NLRB. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WILLIAMS and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges, and POLOZOLA,

  11. Section 159 - Representatives and elections

    29 U.S.C. § 159   Cited 2,439 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it