§

Pinewood Care Center, Inc.

242 N.L.R.B. 816 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Pinewood Care Center, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  2. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 326 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. ZIM'S FOODLINER, INC. v. N.L.R.B

    495 F.2d 1131 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that the owner of a single store purchased from the Kroger chain was a successor employer

  4. Nazareth Regional High School v. N.L.R.B

    549 F.2d 873 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that, to rebut a presumption of majority status, "the employer must produce clear and convincing evidence of loss of union support capable of raising a reasonable doubt of the union's continuing majority"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wayne Convalescent Center

    465 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 17 times

    No. 72-1081. August 29, 1972. Bernard Gottfried, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome H. Brooks, Director Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., on brief, for petitioner. Donald G. Schiff, Southfield, Mich., for appellee. Before WEICK, EDWARDS and MILLER, Circuit Judges. WILLIAM E. MILLER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order directing the respondent, the Wayne Convalescent Center, Inc.,

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Denham

    469 F.2d 239 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 14 times
    In Denham, supra, the court applied Burns and enforced a Board bargaining order against a successor where the union had been recognized on the basis of a card check almost 30 years prior to the ownership change.

  7. Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    540 F.2d 841 (6th Cir. 1976)   Cited 6 times
    In Spitzer, this Court noted that the Second Circuit, in defining the perfectly clear successor exception, relied on the NLRB's decision in Spruce Up Corp., 209 NLRB No. 19 (1974).

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Bachrodt Chevrolet Co.

    468 F.2d 963 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 7 times
    In NLRB v. Bachrodt Chevrolet Co., 468 F.2d 963 (7th Cir. 1972), vacated and remanded, 411 U.S. 912, 93 S.Ct. 1547, 36 L.Ed.2d 304, on remand, 205 N.L.R.B. 784 (1973), enforced, 515 F.2d 512 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 927, 96 S.Ct. 274, 46 L.Ed.2d 255 (1975), the court approved the Board's determination of unlawful unilateral action when an employer manifested a purpose to hire his predecessor's employees without contemporaneously advising them of plans to change working conditions and thereafter fixed working conditions different from those of the predecessor.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burton-Dixie Corp.

    210 F.2d 199 (10th Cir. 1954)   Cited 9 times
    In Burton-Dixie, as here, the employer's attitude made it quite clear that a later request would have been futile, and the court's holding there that the Board properly found a refusal to bargain suggests the propriety of a similar holding here.

  10. Section 159 - Representatives and elections

    29 U.S.C. § 159   Cited 2,441 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it