§

Pine State Creamery Co., Inc.

134 N.L.R.B. 34 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
Pine State Creamery Co., Inc.

16 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wagner Iron Works

    220 F.2d 126 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 48 times

    Nos. 11121, 11141. March 7, 1955. Rehearing Denied April 5, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Maurice Alexandre, Atty., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard Dunau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Albert J. Goldberg, Milwaukee, Wis., for Bridge, Structural Ornamental Iron Workers Shopmen's Local 471 (AFL). Morris Karon, Milwaukee, Wis., for Wagner Iron Works. Max Raskin, Milwaukee, Wis., for International Union, United Automobile

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corporation of America

    291 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 17 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corp. of America, 2 Cir., 291 F.2d 328, 331, the rule under discussion is stated, "Interrogation of employees is legal, when the questioning is not accompanied by any explicit threats, cf. N.L.R.B. v. Beaner [Beaver] Meadow Creamery, 3 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 247, if under all the circumstances coercion is not implicit in the questioning.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Hill Hill Truck Line, Inc.

    266 F.2d 883 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 19 times

    No. 17518. May 15, 1959. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Standau E. Weinbrecht, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John B. Abercrombie, Voris R. Burch, Jr., Houston, Tex., Baker, Botts, Andrews Shepherd, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and BROWN, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Arthur Winer, Inc.

    194 F.2d 370 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 26 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Arthur Winer, Inc., 7 Cir., 194 F.2d 370, 373 (1952), there was a "serious question" of the sufficiency of evidence to sustain many findings of the examiner.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lamar Creamery Co.

    246 F.2d 8 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 19 times

    No. 16361. June 21, 1957. Kenneth C. McGuiness, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Owsley Vose, Edward D. Friedman, Attys., N.L.R.B., Stephen Leonard, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. J.F. McLaughlin and O.B. Fisher of Fisher, McLaughlin Harrison, Paris, Tex., for respondent. Before RIVES, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This petition is for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board reported in 115 N.L.R.B. 1113

  6. Nat'l Rel. v. Armco Drainage Metal

    220 F.2d 573 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 20 times

    No. 12110. February 18, 1955. Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Malcolm F. Halliday, Cincinnati, Ohio (George R. Cassidy, Charles A. Atwood [of Frost Jacobs], Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board filed a petition for enforcement of its order requiring

  7. National L. Rel. Bd. v. Syracuse Color P

    209 F.2d 596 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 21 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Syracuse Color Press, Inc., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 596, we have upheld the Board in finding coercion in the pointed cross-examination of five employees as to union organizing activities within the plant.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Beaver Meadow Creamery

    215 F.2d 247 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times

    No. 11236. Argued May 17, 1954. Decided August 16, 1954. Melvin Spaeth, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Frank G. Smith, Clearfield, Pa. (Frank A. Whitsett, Clearfield, Pa., Smith, Maine, Whitsett Lee, Clearfield, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY,

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Peerless Products, Inc.

    264 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 9 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Peerless Products, Inc., 264 F.2d 769, at p. 772, C.A.7, the court said: "Upon consideration of the record as a whole we have concluded that the interrogation of the employees was not intended to and did not interfere with their organizational activities, that there were no coercive threats made to them, and that the calling in of the small personal loans for repayment did not constitute a withdrawal of economic benefits by the Company in violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act.

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Superior Co.

    199 F.2d 39 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 15 times

    No. 11461. September 19, 1952. Philip Fusco, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Bernard Dunau, and Alice Andrews, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Henry G. Friedlander, New York City (Henry G. Friedlander, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. MILLER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the provisions of § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations