Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 759 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
  4. Snow v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962)   Cited 30 times
    In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.
  5. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. N.L.R.B

    412 F.2d 1 (10th Cir. 1969)   Cited 16 times

    No. 174-68. June 13, 1969. Nathan J. Fullmer, Salt Lake City, Utah, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy and Jonathan M. Marks, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and HILL, United States Circuit Judges. HILL, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for review and cross-petition for enforcement of an order

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Gray Line Tours, Inc.

    461 F.2d 763 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 9 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Gray Line Tours, Inc., 461 F.2d 763 (9th Cir. 1972) (per curiam), this court rejected the Board's finding that bus dispatchers were employees because the dispatchers were authorized to send home drivers who refused to drive a particular bus or who were improperly dressed.
  7. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,415 times   559 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party