Pieper Electric, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 630 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  3. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
  4. Certiorari Denied

    534 U.S. 818 (2001)   Cited 16 times
    Concluding employer entitled to judgment as matter of law where employee offered no evidence of number and types of positions available in local job market that did not require heavy or medium lifting
  5. N.L.R.B. v. A-Plus Roofing, Inc.

    39 F.3d 1410 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that a magistrate judge did not have authority under § 636(b) to conduct criminal contempt trial without consent of defendant
  6. Asarco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    86 F.3d 1401 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 22 times
    Finding of antiunion animus necessary to finding of section 8 violation
  7. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems v. N.L.R.B

    236 F.3d 187 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that when, among other factors, a new negotiator was substituted, "the lack of a significant bargaining history would dictate giving the parties a fuller opportunity to effect an agreement than occurred here"
  8. North Bay Dev. Dis. Serv. v. N.L.R.B

    905 F.2d 476 (D.C. Cir. 1990)   Cited 8 times

    No. 89-1467. Argued May 15, 1990. Decided June 15, 1990. Michael E. Avakian, North Springfield, Va., for petitioner. Margaret G. Bezou, N.L.R.B., with whom Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Peter Winkler, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, D.H. GINSBURG, and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed

  9. Chicago Tribune Co. v. N.L.R.B

    965 F.2d 244 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 91-2750, 91-2916. Argued April 1, 1992. Decided May 29, 1992. Rehearing Denied June 24, 1992. Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Region 13, Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, Linda J. Dreeben, David Seid (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, John C. Truesdale, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C. and Paul Bosanac, N.L.R.B., Region 30, Milwaukee, Wis., for N.L.R.B. R. Eddie Wayland (argued), E. Andrew Norwood, King Ballow, Nashville, Tenn. and William O. Howe

  10. G W Electric Specialty Company v. N.L.R.B

    360 F.2d 873 (7th Cir. 1966)   Cited 10 times

    No. 15376. May 3, 1966. Howard P. Robinson and William P. Richmond, Chicago, Ill., Sidley, Austin, Burgess Smith, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Harold B. Shore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, CASTLE and KILEY, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case is before the Court upon the petition